Skip to content
BounceLab is currently in testing.Want to become one of the first Pro beta testers? Contact us:BounceLab.jump@outlook.comX / @hfzr28Facebook
BOUNCELAB
Back to the Jump Encyclopedia
COMPARISONS

BounceLab vs My Jump, Vert Shock and JumpKit: How to Choose

A practical comparison of assessment-first training with BounceLab, measurement apps like My Jump, fixed programs like Vert Shock, and jump-testing hardware like JumpKit.

August 28, 20268 min readEvidence-Based & Reviewed
📌Part of our comprehensive pillar series: The Complete Vertical Jump Guide
Read pillar guide

Most vertical jump tools fit one of four jobs: measure, prescribe, coach, or motivate. The right choice depends on which link in that chain you are missing.

This guide compares BounceLab against the tools athletes most often ask about, using the same questions for each: what it measures, what it changes, and where it fits in your training loop.

Sports science comparison matrix infographic: BounceLab individualized Force-Velocity profiling versus generic fixed PDF jump training programs

BounceLab: assessment first, then a plan

BounceLab starts with a standardized assessment (Basic, Standard or Advanced), scores your readiness, flags injury risk, and uses that profile to generate a personal training plan. The loop is diagnosis → prescription → re-test, with progress tracking built in.

My Jump / My Jump Lab

My Jump-style apps turn phone video or flight time into jump height. They are strong measurement tools and useful for weekly CMJ tracking. They do not diagnose why the jump is where it is or build a phase plan — that measurement is an input, not a training system.

Vert Shock

Vert Shock is a fixed jump program with a known sequence and community following. If you respond well to a predetermined schedule, it is simple to follow. The limitation of any fixed program is that it cannot adapt to your strength level, injury history, equipment or current bottleneck — two athletes with the same height may need opposite work.

JumpKit and contact mats

JumpKit-style contact mats and flight-time hardware add objective RSI and contact-time measurement. That data pairs naturally with an assessment layer: the hardware answers 'what happened', while a diagnostic layer answers 'why and what next'.

How to choose

Use this decision order rather than buying another program first:

  • No baseline data → measure CMJ, approach jump and broad jump first.
  • Baseline measured but no plan → use BounceLab assessment and plan generation.
  • Need weekly precision → add a My Jump-style app or contact mat for tracking.
  • Want a simple fixed block → try a fixed program, but re-test and change it if the bottleneck is not addressed.
  • Returning from injury → prioritize assessment, load management and professional clearance.

A practical stack

Many athletes get the best result from combining tools rather than choosing one: use a measurement app or mat for testing, BounceLab for diagnosis and periodized prescription, and a fixed program only as a temporary training block if it matches the diagnosed bottleneck.

Key takeaways

  • Measurement tools say what changed; diagnostic tools say what to train next.
  • BounceLab covers diagnosis, plan generation and re-testing in one loop.
  • Fixed programs work best when the athlete already matches their assumptions.
  • A contact mat or phone app improves the precision of any training plan.
  • The best stack often combines measurement + assessment rather than choosing one product.

Related calculators

References

Keep reading

Related exercises